Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14743206›Full record

ArticleOncogene2004

Mutant p53 exerts a dominant negative effect by preventing wild-type p53 from binding to the promoter of its target genes.

Amy Willis, Eun Joo Jung, Therese Wakefield, Xinbin Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 174 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
174citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

174 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 330 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. TP53 mutations and MDM2 polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancers: amelioration by drugs and natural compounds.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy WillisDepartment of Cell Biology and UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0005, USA.
Eun Joo Jung
Therese Wakefield
Xinbin Chen
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Mechanism of p53-Mediated Tumor SuppressionR01CA076069 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, XINBIN · 2002 to 2017
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS 2 R01 CA076069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene is the most common genetic alteration in human cancer. A majority of these mutations are missense mutations in the DNA-binding domain. As a result, the mutated p53 gene encodes a full-length protein incapable of transactivating its target genes. In addition to this loss of function, mutant p53 can have a dominant negative effect over wild-type p53 and/or gain of function activity independently of the wild-type protein. To better understand the nature of the tumorigenic activity of mutant p53, we have investigated the mechanism by which mutant p53 can exert a dominant negative effect. We have established several stable cell lines capable of inducibly expressing a p53 mutant alone, wild-type p53 alone, or both proteins concurrently. In this context, we have used chromatin immunoprecipitation to determine the ability of wild-type p53 to bind to its endogenous target genes in the presence of various p53 mutants. We have found that p53 missense mutants markedly reduce the binding of wild-type p53 to the p53 responsive element in the target genes of p21, MDM2, and PIG3. These findings correlate with the reduced ability of wild-type p53 in inducing these and other endogenous target genes and growth suppression in the presence of mutant p53. We also showed that mutant p53 suppresses the ability of wild-type p53 in inducing cell cycle arrest. This highlights the sensitivity and utility of the dual inducible expression system because in previous studies, p53-mediated cell cycle arrest is not affected by transiently overexpressed p53 mutants. Together, our data showed that mutant p53 exerts its dominant negative activity by abrogating the DNA binding, and subsequently the growth suppression, functions of wild-type p53.

Indexed as

Genes, DominantMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticCell CycleDNATranscriptional ActivationTumor Suppressor Protein p53DNATumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID14743206
OpenAlexW2013126678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.