Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14742195›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

In vitro selection and characterization of resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

S Pereyre, C Guyot, H Renaudin, A Charron, C Bébéar, C M Bébéar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Reporting macrolide-resistantJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Distribution Characteristics ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Macrolide-resistantFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Novel features ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Macrolide resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Prevalence ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Novel mechanisms of macrolide resistance revealed byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Global research trends ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S PereyreLaboratoire de Bactériologie, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
C Guyot
H Renaudin
A Charron
C Bébéar
C M Bébéar
Université de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrolide-resistant mutants of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were selected in vitro from the susceptible reference strain M129, by 23 to 50 serial passages in subinhibitory concentrations of macrolides and related antibiotics, erythromycin A, azithromycin, josamycin, clindamycin, quinupristin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, pristinamycin, and telithromycin. Mutants for which the MICs are increased could be selected with all antibiotics except the streptogramin B quinupristin. Portions of genes encoding 23S rRNA (domains II and V) and ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 of mutants were amplified by PCR, and their nucleotide sequences were compared to those of the susceptible strain M129. No mutation could be detected in domain II of 23S rRNA. Two point mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA, C2611A and A2062G, were selected in the presence of erythromycin A, azithromycin, josamycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and telithromycin. Mutants selected in the presence of clindamycin and telithromycin harbored a single amino acid change (H70R or H70L, respectively) in ribosomal protein L4, whereas insertions of one, two, or three adjacent glycines at position 60 (M. pneumoniae numbering) were selected in the presence of both streptogramin combinations. Telithromycin was the sole antibiotic that selected for substitutions (P112R and A114T) and deletions ((111)IPRA(114)) in ribosomal protein L22. Three sequential mutational events in 23S rRNA and in both ribosomal proteins were required to categorize the strain as resistant to the ketolide. Azithromycin and erythromycin A were the only selector antibiotics that remained active (MICs, 0.06 and 1 micro g/ml, respectively) on their mutants selected after 50 passages.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialGenes, BacterialMacrolidesMutationMycoplasma pneumoniaeOligonucleotide ProbesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRibosomal ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 23SAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialMacrolidesOligonucleotide ProbesRibosomal ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID14742195
PMCPMC321523
OpenAlexW2148644647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.