ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2003
Genetic factors in assisted reproduction.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Does the IVF regulation modify our medical management?].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is still unclear whether the procedures of assisted reproduction increase the risk of congenital malformations. Thus, it remains to be clarified whether an increased risk, if any, of congenital malformations in these children is caused by the procedure of assisted reproduction itself or by the underlying maternal and paternal background. From the genetic point of view, infertility patients seeking assisted reproduction have to be classified as a high-risk group. The prevalence of numerical chromosomal abnormalities is around 10% in these patients, compared with 0.85% in the general population. The prevalence of structural chromosomal abnormalities is around 0.1% in the general population and is increased up to 1% in patients seeking assisted reproduction. In addition, patients with microdeletions of the Y-chromosome or mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane-conductance regulator gene are likely to be encountered at the fertility clinic. Therefore, genetic screening and counselling should be routinely offered to infertility patients. They also need to understand that parental factors can be transferred to offspring that would most likely not have been conceived by natural means.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.