Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14739374›Full record

ReviewOccupational and environmental medicine2004

The transmission of tuberculosis in the light of new molecular biological approaches.

A Seidler, A Nienhaus, R Diel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Tuberculosis in healthcare workers - a narrative review from a German perspective.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2014
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A SeidlerInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. A.Seidler@em.uni-frankfurt.de
A Nienhaus
R Diel
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DENational Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review briefly summarises the recent achievements in tuberculosis epidemiology associated with the introduction of molecular methods, and considers the implications of these methods for the understanding of occupational tuberculosis transmission. Special attention is paid to the relative contribution of recently transmitted tuberculosis; risk factors for recent transmission; and the occurrence and frequency of exogenous reinfection. There is a need for occupational epidemiological studies, which should combine the methods of "classical" epidemiology with those of molecular epidemiology.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDNA FingerprintingHumansMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacterium tuberculosisOccupational DiseasesTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID14739374
PMCPMC1740712
OpenAlexW2068116846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.