Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14739189›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Cohort study of examination performance of undergraduate medical students learning in community settings.

Paul Worley, Adrian Esterman, David Prideaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Contribution of Citizens to Community-Based Medical Education in Japan: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Longitudinal integrated clerkships: a hermeneutic literature review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Value of Paediatrics Placements: Confidence or Competence? [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2020
    Article
  15. Perception of educational environment among medical students in Thailand.International journal of medical education · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Otolaryngology exposure in a longitudinal integrated clerkship setting.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Perception of educational value in clinical rotations by medical students.Advances in medical education and practice · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul WorleyFlinders University Rural Clinical School, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. paul.worley@flinders.edu.au
Adrian Esterman
David Prideaux

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether moving clinical medical education out of the tertiary hospital into a community setting compromises academic standards.

designCohort study.

settingFlinders University four year graduate entry medical course. In their third year, students are able to choose to study at the tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, in rural general practices, or at Royal Darwin Hospital, a regional secondary referral hospital.

participantsAll 371 medical students who did their year 3 study from 1998-2002.

main outcome measuresMean student examination score (%) at the end of year 3.

resultsThe unadjusted mean year 3 scores at each location differed significantly (P < 0.001); the mean score was 65.2 (SE = 0.43) for Adelaide students, 68.2 (0.83) for Darwin students, and 69.3 (0.97) for students on the rural programme. Mean year 2 scores were similar for each location. Post hoc tests of means adjusted for sex, age, year 2 score, and cohort year showed that the rural and Darwin groups had a significantly improved score in year 3 compared with the Adelaide group (adjusted mean difference = 3.08, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 4.90, P < 0.001 for rural group; 1.91, 0.47 to 3.36, P = 0.001 for Darwin group).

conclusionsThese findings show that the concern that student academic performance in the tertiary hospital would be better than that of students in the regional hospital and community settings is not justified. This challenges the orthodoxy of a tertiary hospital education being the gold standard for undergraduate medical students.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementAdultAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesCommunity MedicineEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleSouth AustraliaStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID14739189
PMCPMC318489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.