Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14736794›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2004

The cone dysfunction syndromes.

M Michaelides, D M Hunt, A T Moore

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Gene therapy rescues cone function inMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Impact of ChromaGen lenses on colour vision test performance of individuals with congenital colour vision deficiency.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Novel compound heterozygousExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pathogenic Deep Intronic Variant inCase reports in genetics · 2025
    Article
  11. A Practical Approach to Retinal Dystrophies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Mimickers of hydroxychloroquine retinal toxicity.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Gene Therapy for Achromatopsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MichaelidesInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK.
D M Hunt
A T Moore
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cone dystrophies comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by visual loss, abnormalities of colour vision, central scotomata, and a variable degree of nystagmus and photophobia. They may be stationary or progressive. The stationary cone dystrophies are better described as cone dysfunction syndromes since a dystrophy often describes a progressive process. These different syndromes encompass a wide range of clinical and psychophysical findings. The aim is to review current knowledge relating to the cone dysfunction syndromes, with discussion of the various phenotypes, the currently mapped genes, and genotype-phenotype relations. The cone dysfunction syndromes that will be discussed are complete and incomplete achromatopsia, oligocone trichromacy, cone monochromatism, blue cone monochromatism, and Bornholm eye disease. Disorders with a progressive cone dystrophy phenotype will not be discussed.

Indexed as

Color Vision DefectsGenotypeHumansMutationPhenotypePsychophysicsScotomaSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID14736794
PMCPMC1771989
OpenAlexW4256501614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.