ArticleDer Internist2004
[Gallbladder calculi--always an indication for surgery?].
Article in Der Internist, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- A comparative analysis of preoperative single-dose antimicrobial therapy versus extended postoperative antimicrobial regimen in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is consensus that symptomatic cholecystolithiasis presents an indication for cholecystectomy. Today the surgical method of choice is the laparoscopic technique, which has proven its superiority in numerous randomized studies. Epidemiologic studies showed that 10-15% of all gallstone patients develop complications so that a prophylactic cholecystectomy is repeatedly being discussed. A few older studies based on conventional cholecystectomies, however, showed no decisive advantage for a prophylactic cholecystectomy, but rather clearly higher costs. Therefore a wait-and-see policy is generally recommended for asymptomatic gallstones. The analysis of our large group of patients showed that acute cholecystitis as well as common bile duct stones occur significantly more often with increasing duration of the gallstone disease. The older the patient, the longer the operation time, the more frequent a conversion, and the higher the morbidity of the procedure. Considering the minor impairment of daily activities with the laparoscopic technique, the present concept of treatment for asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic cholecystolithiasis needs to be scrutinized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.