Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14735179›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2004

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL): long-term results from a retrospective multicentre Italian experience in 138 patients treated with CHOP or MACOP-B/VACOP-B.

G Todeschini, S Secchi, E Morra, U Vitolo, E Orlandi, F Pasini, E Gallo, A Ambrosetti, C Tecchio, C Tarella and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Fatal anterior mediastinal mass in a pregnant lady.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

G TodeschiniDepartment of Hematology, Verona University, Italy. giuseppe.todeschinil@tin.it
S Secchi
E Morra
U Vitolo
E Orlandi
F Pasini
E Gallo
A Ambrosetti
C Tecchio
C Tarella
A Gabbas
A Gallamini
L Gargantini
M Pizzuti
G Fioritoni
L Gottin
G Rossi
M Lazzarino
F Menestrina
M Paulli
M Palestro
M G Cabras
F Di Vito
G Pizzolo
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITOspedale di Santo Spirito · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITAzienda USL della Valle d’Aosta · ITOspedale San Carlo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal treatment of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is still undefined. In the absence of randomised studies, we retrospectively analysed: (a) the effectiveness of two chemotherapy regimens (CHOP vs MACOP-B/VACOP-B) in complete remission (CR) achievement and event-free survival (EFS) and (b) the role of mediastinal involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) as consolidation. From 1982 to 1999, 138 consecutive patients affected by PMLBCL were treated in 13 Italian institutions with CHOP (43) or MACOP-B/VACOP-B (95). The two groups of patients were similar as regard to age, gender, presence of bulky mediastinal mass, pleural effusion, stage and international prognostic indexes category of risk. Overall, 75.5% of patients in CR received IF-RT as consolidation. Complete remission was 51.1% in the CHOP group and 80% in MACOP-B/VACOP-B (P<0.001). Relapse occurred in 22.7% of CHOP- and in 9.2% of MACOP-B/VACOP-B-treated patients (n.s.). Event-free patients were 39.5% in CHOP and 75.7% in the MACOP-B/VACOP-B group (P<0.001). The addition of IF-RT as consolidation improved the outcome, irrespectively of the type of chemotherapy (P=0.04). At a multivariate analysis, achievement of CR (P<0.0001) and type of CT (MACOP-B/VACOP-B) retained the significance for OS (P=0.008) and EFS (P=0.03). In our experience, MACOP-B/VACOP-B appears to positively influence OS and EFS in patients affected by PMLBCL, as compared to CHOP. Consolidation IF-RT on mediastinum further improves the outcome of CR patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBleomycinCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinEtoposideFemaleHumansLeucovorinLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleBleomycinCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinEtoposideLeucovorinMethotrexatePrednisoneVincristine

Identifiers

PMID14735179
PMCPMC2409547
OpenAlexW2128627706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.