Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2004
Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Oral Topotecan in Infants and Very Young Children with Brain Tumors Demonstrates a Role of ABCG2 rs4148157 on the Absorption Rate Constant.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2016Trial
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis of AR-67, a lactone stable camptothecin analogue, in cancer patients with solid tumors.Investigational new drugs · 2019Article
- Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours and impaired renal function.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Combination metronomic oral topotecan and pazopanib: a pharmacokinetic study in patients with gynecological cancer.Anticancer research · 2013Article
- Dose banding as an alternative to body surface area-based dosing of chemotherapeutic agents.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for topotecan in mice.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2011Article
- Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent topotecan, and explore the influence of patient covariates and interoccasion variability on drug disposition. Data were obtained from 190 patients who received the drug as a 30-min infusion (N=72) or orally (N=118). The population model was built with the use of NONMEM to identify candidate covariates, and obtain models for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. The final models were based on first-order absorption with lag-time (oral data), and a two-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment. The Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) and WHO performance status (PS) were the only significant covariates: CL=(12.8+2.1 x CrCl) x (1-0.12 x PS). For the volume of distribution, a correlation was found between body weight and the central volume (V1)=0.58 x body weight. Based on the structural models, a limited-sampling strategy was developed with minor bias and good precision that can be applied a posteriori using timed samples obtained at 1.5, and 6 h after the administration of topotecan. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model for topotecan has been developed that incorporates measures of renal function and PS to predict CL. In combination with drug monitoring, the limited sampling strategy allows individualised treatment for patients receiving oral topotecan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.