Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14734824›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2004

Specificity and performance of PCR detection assays for microbial pathogens.

Konrad Sachse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Catching the ElusiveBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026
    Review
  2. Comprehensive virome analysis ofFrontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Konrad SachseFederal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals (BFAV), Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Naumburger Str. 96a, 07743 Jena, Germany. k.sachse@jena.bfav.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCR has become a widely used tool for detection, identification and differentiation of pathogenic microorganisms in diagnosis of animal and human diseases. However, quite a number of currently used protocols can be further optimized to exclude nonspecific reactions. On the one hand, target sequences as defined by primer binding sites should be checked carefully for the absence of significant homologies to other organisms in order to insure high specificity of detection. A major part of PCR assays is still based on target sequences in the ribosomal RNA operon, but, as the differentiating potential of this region is limited, genes encoding cellular proteins, such as toxins, surface antigens or enzymes, have been shown to be a viable alternative in many instances. On the other hand, various approaches are available to improve the performance of the amplification reaction itself. The kinetics of amplification is known to be heavily dependent on primer-to-template ratio, efficiency of primer annealing and enzyme-to-template ratio. In the present paper, recently published PCR detection assays for microorganisms, particularly bacterial pathogens, are reviewed and optimization strategies are explained. The practical implications and epidemiological consequences of routine use of PCR in the diagnostic laboratory are also discussed.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBinding SitesDNADNA, BacterialDNA PrimersKineticsNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, RibosomalTemperatureTime FactorsDNADNA, BacterialDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID14734824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.