Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14734823›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2004

Generation and production of engineered antibodies.

Sergey M Kipriyanov, Fabrice Le Gall

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Nanobody-Based Platforms for Precision Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  2. The reduced form of the antibody CH2 domain.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-assembly of antibodies by chemical induction.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A new generation of protein display scaffolds for molecular recognition.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2006
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergey M KipriyanovAffimed Therapeutics AG, Technologiepark, Im Neuenheimer Feld 582, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. kipriyanov@affimed.com
Fabrice Le Gall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various forms of recombinant monoclonal antibodies are being used increasingly, mainly for therapeutic purposes. This review specifically focuses on what is now called antibody engineering, and discusses the generation of chimeric, humanized, and fully human recombinant antibodies, immunoglobulin fragments, and artificial antigen-binding molecules. Since the production of recombinant antibodies is a limiting factor in their availability, and a shortage is expected in the future, different expression systems for recombinant antibodies and transgenic organisms as bioreactors are also discussed, along with their advantages and drawbacks.

Indexed as

Immunologic TechniquesProtein EngineeringAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody FormationBioreactorsCloning, MolecularGenetic EngineeringHumansMiceModels, MolecularPeptide LibraryPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein Structure, TertiaryAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID14734823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.