Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14729769›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2004

Optimal therapeutic strategies in the setting of post-infarct no reflow: the need for a pathogenetic classification.

L Galiuto

Abstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Predictors of no-reflow in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombus aspiration was protective.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CMR of microvascular obstruction and hemorrhage in myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Non-invasive imaging of microvascular damage.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L Galiuto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationCoronary VasospasmHumansMicrocirculationMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial ReperfusionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryVascular Patency

Identifiers

PMID14729769
PMCPMC1768057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.