Trial reportAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2003
A randomized controlled trial of a patient-accessible electronic medical record.
Trial report in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- How To Hospital: barriers to developing a patient 'Hospital Survival Guide' to support information transfer during ward-rounds on the patient journey from admission to hospital to discharge.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Anticipated Benefits and Concerns of Sharing Hospital Outpatient Visit Notes With Patients (Open Notes) in Dutch Hospitals: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Patient Portal Preferences: Perspectives on Imaging Information.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2015Article
- The anxious wait: assessing the impact of patient accessible EHRs for breast cancer patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2010Article
- Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2008Article
- Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008Article
- Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legal and technologic trends are making medical records more patient-accessible. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) stipulates that "patients must be able to see and get copies of their records, and request amendments." Medical records are more commonly being stored in electronically, and methods have been developed to share these records with patients in a secure format.1,2 Previous studies of patient-accessible medical records generally only provided limited exposure to the medical record and lacked controls for bias and confounding.3 We performed a 12-month randomized controlled trial of a patient-accessible medical record to further assess the effects of such a program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14728493PMC1480093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.