Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1472835›Full record

ReviewThe Clinical investigator1992

On the potential of simple repetitive DNA for fingerprinting in clinical, forensic, and evolutionary dynamic studies.

J T Epplen, G Melmer, P Schmidt, L Roewer, J Hundrieser, C Epplen, J Buitkamp

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Clinical investigator, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of the most represented repeated motifs in Arabidopsis thaliana microsatellite loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 1995
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J T EpplenMolekulare Humangenetik, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum.
G Melmer
P Schmidt
L Roewer
J Hundrieser
C Epplen
J Buitkamp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to discuss critically the practical meaning of a specific genome component, simple repetitive desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences as clinical and forensic and diagnostic and research tools. Previously, multilocus DNA fingerprinting was the major technology employed to visualize such simple repeat sequences. This technique enables many polymorphic loci to be simultaneously detected thus yielding vast amounts of information. With the advent of enzymatic DNA amplification via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), individual simple repeat loci can be demonstrated, theoretically even from single DNA molecules and so a wealth of additional approaches have also become feasible. In general investigating, small, known, single copy parts of genomes have not posed truly insurmountable problems if enough material was available. There have even been a few (anecdotal) reports on the amplification of simple repeats from ancient DNA (see, e.g. [30]. Here we would like to after a solid basis for an earnest discussion of the applications of these simple repetitive sequences using various methodological approaches relevant for clinical diagnosis, setting aside the obvious unsolved mysteries of their biology.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsArtifactsBiological EvolutionDNA ProbesDNA, SatelliteForecastingForensic MedicineHumansIn Situ HybridizationPaternityPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA ProbesDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID1472835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.