ReviewThe Clinical investigator1992
On the potential of simple repetitive DNA for fingerprinting in clinical, forensic, and evolutionary dynamic studies.
Review in The Clinical investigator, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chloride conductance and genetic background modulate the cystic fibrosis phenotype of Delta F508 homozygous twins and siblings.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2001Article
- Identification of the most represented repeated motifs in Arabidopsis thaliana microsatellite loci.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 1995Article
- Simple repetitive DNA sequences from primates: compilation and analysis.Journal of molecular evolution · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to discuss critically the practical meaning of a specific genome component, simple repetitive desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences as clinical and forensic and diagnostic and research tools. Previously, multilocus DNA fingerprinting was the major technology employed to visualize such simple repeat sequences. This technique enables many polymorphic loci to be simultaneously detected thus yielding vast amounts of information. With the advent of enzymatic DNA amplification via the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), individual simple repeat loci can be demonstrated, theoretically even from single DNA molecules and so a wealth of additional approaches have also become feasible. In general investigating, small, known, single copy parts of genomes have not posed truly insurmountable problems if enough material was available. There have even been a few (anecdotal) reports on the amplification of simple repeats from ancient DNA (see, e.g. [30]. Here we would like to after a solid basis for an earnest discussion of the applications of these simple repetitive sequences using various methodological approaches relevant for clinical diagnosis, setting aside the obvious unsolved mysteries of their biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1472835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.