ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2003
Emergency Department data for bioterrorism surveillance: electronic data availability, timeliness, sources and standards.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical Description of the Distribute Project: A Community-based Syndromic Surveillance System Implementation.Online journal of public health informatics · 2014Article
- Implementation of Emergency Medical Text Classifier for syndromic surveillance.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013Article
- Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2011Article
- Timeliness of emergency department diagnoses for syndromic surveillance.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2006Article
- Fever detection from free-text clinical records for biosurveillance.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency Department (ED) data are a key component of bioterrorism surveillance systems. Little research has been done to examine differences in ED data capture and entry across hospitals, regions and states. The purpose of this study was to describe the current state of ED data for use in bioterrorism surveillance in 2 regions of the country. We found that chief complaint (CC) data are available electronically in 54% of the North Carolina EDs surveyed, and in 100% of the Seattle area EDs. Over half of all EDs reported that CCs are recorded in free text form. Though all EDs have electronic diagnosis data, less than half report that diagnoses are coded within 24 hours of the ED visit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14728256PMC1479948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.