Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14728232›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2003

Challenges to physicians' use of a wireless alert pager.

Madhu C Reddy, Wanda Pratt, David W McDonald, M Michael Shabot

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The use of wireless e-mail to improve healthcare team communication.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Towards pervasive computing in health care - a literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhu C ReddySchool Management and Information Systems, University of Missouri, Rolla, USA.
Wanda Pratt
David W McDonald
M Michael Shabot
Missouri University of Science and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pagers, personal data assistants (PDAs) and other devices that have wireless connectivity are becoming a popular method for delivering patient related information to medical decision makers. Although medical informatics research has emphasized the design, and implementation of pagers as event notification mechanisms, researchers have not paid as much attention to how this technology impacts medical work. We present a case study of physicians in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) using wireless alert pagers. The pagers provide a variety of alphanumeric clinical alert messages and are widely used by SICU physicians. However, the use of the pagers has created unanticipated challenges to the physicians' traditional work practices. These challenges include: (1) flattening of hierarchical workflows, (2) coping with information overload and missing context, and (3) lack of feedback. These challenges are tied to both the specific technical design of the system and the traditional structure of medical work.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHospital Communication SystemsInterprofessional RelationsPhysiciansHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterviews as TopicNurse's RoleObservationOrganizational CultureReminder SystemsTelecommunications

Identifiers

PMID14728232
PMCPMC1480301
OpenAlexW1560680228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.