ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2003
Bioinformatics for medical diagnostics: assessment of microarray data in the context of clinical databases.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationTo identify genes suitable for medical diagnostics microarray data is assessed in the context of clinical databases, which store complex information about the patient phenotype. The wealth of data and lacking standards make it difficult to analyse this kind of data.
resultsWe present a workflow for exploratory analysis of microarray data together with clinical data consisting of four steps: definition of clinically meaningful research questions in a masterfile, generation of analysis files, selection and characterization of differentially expressed genes, and estimation of classification accuracy. We applied this workflow to large data sets from the field of cardiology and oncology (n~500 patients). Systematic data management of microarray data and clinical data helps to make results more transparent and comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14728164PMC1480146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.