Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14728057›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2004

Treatment benefit and daily drug costs associated with treating Parkinson's disease in a Parkinson's disease clinic.

Thomas Müller, Birgit Voss, Kerstin Hellwig, Franz Josef Stein, Thorsten Schulte, Horst Przuntek

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Benefit on motor and non-motor behavior in a specialized unit for Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2017
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Levodopa increases speed of alternating movements in Parkinson's disease patients.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Diadochokinetic movements differ between patients with Parkinson's disease and controls.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas MüllerDepartment of Neurology, St Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. thomas.mueller@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Birgit Voss
Kerstin Hellwig
Franz Josef Stein
Thorsten Schulte
Horst Przuntek
Ruhr University Bochum · DESegeberger Kliniken · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn some countries, such as Germany, there has been a move towards the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease in specialised inpatient units. However, data on patient outcome and the daily costs of antiparkinsonian drugs in these settings are rare. This study was conducted to determine the effect of an inpatient setting (a specialised Parkinson's disease clinic) on drug therapy costs and patient symptoms. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study involved 63 consecutively referred inpatients of a Parkinson's disease clinic. On entry to the clinic, the patients' antiparkinsonian drug regimen was titrated in order to improve their motor function. The daily costs of drug therapy per patient (in 2002 values) were calculated, and the severity of Parkinson's disease symptoms scored via scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and standardised instrumental procedures (peg insertion and tapping), both initially and at the end of the patients' stay in the clinic. The variables between the two evaluation timepoints were compared.

resultsThe titration of antiparkinsonian drugs was associated with a significant decrease in the symptoms of Parkinson's disease at discharge from the clinic compared with admission (as measured by UPDRS total and subscale scores [all p < 0.001], and, to a lesser extent, by peg insertion and tapping [both p < 0.05]). A significant increase in daily drug costs (an increase of euro14.11 per patient for all drugs and euro12.36 per patient for antiparkinsonian drugs [both p <0.001]) was also observed.

conclusionThe results demonstrate that the symptoms experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease improve after performance of antiparkinsonian drug titration within the setting of a specialised Parkinson's disease clinic. The effect on symptoms was seen most clearly with the UPDRS, although both peg insertion and tapping reflected this improvement to a certain extent. Drug titration resulted in, on average, a doubling of daily drug costs. Future trials are needed to investigate the long-term effects of such a hospital stay on indirect costs associated with treating Parkinson's disease, and on caregiver burden, and also to compare the efficacy of a Parkinson's disease clinic with an outpatient setting.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisHealth Care CostsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntiparkinson AgentsFemaleHospitals, SpecialHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityParkinson DiseaseProspective StudiesPsychomotor PerformanceAntiparkinson Agents

Identifiers

PMID14728057
OpenAlexW2080967751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.