ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2004
Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein- and PCR-based markers.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in white lupin.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- SSR-based genetic diversity and population structure analysis of 144 core pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic variation of barley genotypes using morphological traits, amylose content, and molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Genomic prediction and allele mining of agronomic and morphological traits in pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Selection of superior accessions of turnip (Food science & nutrition · 2022Article
- Article
- Trait Expression and Environmental Responses of Pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Characterization of phenolic compounds in two novel lines of Pisum sativum L. along with their in vitro antioxidant potential.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Article
- Patterns of Genetic Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in a Large Collection of Pea Germplasm.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- A community resource for exploring and utilizing genetic diversity in the USDA pea single plant plus collection.Horticulture research · 2017Article
- Aggressiveness Changes in Populations of Didymella pinodes over Winter and Spring Pea Cropping Seasons.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Assessment of genetic diversity in Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions with newly developed EST-SSR markers.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Genetic diversity and trait genomic prediction in a pea diversity panel.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Genomic Tools in Pea Breeding Programs: Status and Perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Review
- Genetic diversity and population structure among pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars as revealed by simple sequence repeat and novel genic markers.Molecular biotechnology · 2014Article
- Transcriptome sequencing for high throughput SNP development and genetic mapping in Pea.BMC genomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A collection of 148 Pisum accessions, mostly from Western Europe, and including both primitive germplasm and cultivated types, was structured using 121 protein- and PCR-based markers. This molecular marker-based classification allowed us to trace back major lineages of pea breeding in Western Europe over the last decades, and to follow the main breeding objectives: increase of seed weight, introduction of the afila foliage type and white flowers, and improvement of frost tolerance for winter-sown peas. The classification was largely consistent with the available pedigree data, and clearly resolved the different main varietal types according to their end-uses (fodder, food and feed peas) from exotic types and wild forms. Fodder types were further separated into two sub-groups. Feed peas, corresponding to either spring-sown or winter-sown types, were also separated, with two apparently different gene pools for winter-sown peas. The garden pea group was the most difficult to structure, probably due to a continuum in breeding of feed peas from garden types. The classification also stressed the paradox between the narrowness of the genetic basis of recent cultivars and the very large diversity available within P. sativum. A sub-collection of 43 accessions representing 96% of the whole allelic variability is proposed as a starting point for the construction of a core collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14727027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.