ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2004
Awareness of osteoporosis among physicians in China.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, Awareness and Perception towards Osteoporosis Risk in China: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Review
- Osteoporosis in East Asia: Current issues in assessment and management.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2016Review
- Eosinophilic fasciitis: what matters in management in a developing country--a case report with two and a half-year follow-up.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2012Article
- Osteoporosis Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Beliefs among College Students in the USA and China.Journal of osteoporosis · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have projected a vast increase in osteoporotic fractures in Asia, with the majority occurring in China. Awareness of osteoporosis among medical professionals and the pattern of management in Asia have not been explored. A total of 504 doctors in Hong Kong, China with their self-reported practice likely to receive clients with or at risk of osteoporosis were invited to complete a postal questionnaire on the diagnosis and management of their osteoporotic patients. In all, 204 questionnaires were returned, with a response rate of 41%. Only 76% of the respondents reported treating osteoporosis patients in their practice. Ninety-one percent believed that osteoporosis was under-diagnosed. The asymptomatic nature of the disease (66%), inaccessibility (45%) and high cost (54%) of the diagnostic tools were considered major reasons for under-diagnosis. DXA was employed for diagnosis by only 53% of the doctors. Peripheral machines such as ultrasound and quantitative computed tomography were used by 35% of the responders as the only diagnostic tool, especially among clinic-based doctors (clinic-based physicians 47%, hospital-based physicians 17%; P<0.001). Thirty-three percent of the surveyed doctors were unaware of published guidelines for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Concerning treatment goals, 82% considered prevention of future fractures and 66% believed improvement in the quality of life of patients as critical or highly important, whereas only about half of the doctors thought that increase in BMD was important. On the other hand, 60% of the doctors considered the cost of therapy a critical or highly important element in the management of osteoporosis. This study showed that physicians in Hong Kong were aware of osteoporosis, though the disease was still under-diagnosed due to inaccessibility and high cost of the diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents. These findings stress the importance of expanding efforts to increase knowledge and awareness among health care providers and also provide future directions for developing strategies for managing osteoporosis in developing Asian regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.