ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2004
Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene-edited cells: novel allogeneic gene/cell therapy for epidermolysis bullosa.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Review
- Stairways to Advanced Therapies for Epidermolysis Bullosa.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023Review
- Clinical characteristics, healthcare use, and annual costs among patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Toward Combined Cell and Gene Therapy for Genodermatoses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020Review
- Gingival augmentation by combination of laser and Acellular Dermal Matrix allograft in a patient with dystrophic form of epidermolysis bullosa: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2018Article
- Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in pregnancy: a case report of the autosomal dominant subtype and review of the literature.Case reports in medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14726937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.