Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2005
   Trial
2. Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study.PloS one · 2023
   Article
3. Ethical and research governance approval across Europe: Experiences from three European palliative care studies.Palliative medicine · 2020
   Article
4. Insights into the perception that research ethics committees are a barrier to research with seriously ill children: A study of committee minutes and correspondence with researchers studying seriously ill children.Palliative medicine · 2020
   Article
5. Do patients of integrative anthroposophic pediatric inpatient departments differ? Comparative analysis to all pediatric inpatients in Germany considering demographic and clinical characteristics.BMC public health · 2019
   Article
6. Methodological challenges in European ethics approvals for a genetic epidemiology study in critically ill patients: the GenOSept experience.BMC medical ethics · 2019
   Article
7. Underlying Processes of an Inverted Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning - An Eye-Tracking Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2017
   Article
8. National Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and Sweden.Ethics & behavior · 2016
   Article
9. Evaluation of 5536 patients treated in an integrative outpatient tinnitus treatment center-immediate effects and a modeling approach for sustainability.BMC health services research · 2016
   Article
10. Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016
    Article
11. Patients' preferences for post-treatment breast cancer follow-up in primary care vs. secondary care: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
12. The influence of doctor-patient and midwife-patient relationship in quality care perception of italian pregnant women: an exploratory study.PloS one · 2015
    Article
13. Long-term follow-up for cardiovascular disease after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for breast cancer in an unselected population.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
14. Researchers' perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis.Trials · 2013
    Article
15. Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.BMC medical ethics · 2012
    Article
16. Psychometric properties of the Confidence and Trust in Delivery Questionnaire (CTDQ): a pilot study.BMC women's health · 2012
    Article
17. In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees.Journal of medical ethics · 2012
    Article
18. Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research.Trials · 2011
    Article
19. Development and pilot of an internationally standardized measure of cardiovascular risk management in European primary care.BMC health services research · 2011
    Article
20. A framework for research ethics review during public emergencies.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?2004
• Commented on by
  Ethics review in research: research governance also delays research.2004
• Commented on by
  Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely.2004
• Commented on by
  Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk averse.2004

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as