ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
Ethics review roulette: what can we learn?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving research ethics review and governance can improve human health.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2021Article
- Protecting the public from the adverse effects of confused research ethics.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2021Article
- Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: an audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016Article
- Research ethics committees in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the United States.Health research policy and systems · 2016Article
- The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre research.Research integrity and peer review · 2016Article
- Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind Initiative, 2003-2013.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2013Article
- Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries.BMC medical ethics · 2011Article
- Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?BMC public health · 2008Article
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system.Journal of medical ethics · 2007Article
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?Journal of medical ethics · 2006Review
- Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network.BMC medical ethics · 2006Article
- Research protocols: waiving confidentiality for the greater good.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Review
- Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?Health research policy and systems · 2005Article
- Research ethics committees in the UK--the pressure is now on research and development departments.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Review
- Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.Quality & safety in health care · 2005Article
- The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?Journal of medical ethics · 2005Article
- The other face of research governance.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
- Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.