Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14723840›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2004

Pill Esophagitis.

Nathaniel S. Winstead, Robert Bulat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathaniel S. WinsteadSection of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, 1430 Tulane Avenue, SL35, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699, USA. rbulat@tulane.edu
Robert Bulat
Tulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pill esophagitis is a preventable cause of morbidity. Simple advice on how and when to take medication could probably prevent most cases of the illness. Avoidance of implicated medications in patients with significant risk factors for developing pill esophagitis could prevent additional cases. When the disease presents despite these preventive measures, the mainstays of treatment are immediate discontinuation of the offending agent and supportive care. If the diagnosis is in question, the principle diagnostic modalities are double-contrast barium esophagogram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Medical management of moderate to severe cases includes sucralfate to coat, protect, and promote healing of ulcerated esophageal mucosa, and acid-suppressing therapy if gastroesophageal reflux disease is felt to have played a role in the pathogenesis of the illness. Rare cases may require therapeutic endoscopy or surgical intervention early in the disease course. Late complications include esophageal strictures that may require therapeutic endoscopy or bougienage.

Identifiers

PMID14723840
OpenAlexW3188915511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.