ReviewDrugs2004
The glycylcyclines: a comparative review with the tetracyclines.
Review in Drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.
- Culture-directed antibiotics in peritoneal dialysis solutions: a systematic review focused on stability and compatibility.Journal of nephrology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of high-dose tigecycline for the treatment of infectious diseases: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Excess deaths associated with tigecycline after approval based on noninferiority trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012Pooled it
- A multicentre, randomized, double-masked, parallel group, vehicle-controlled phase IIb study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 1% and 3% topical minocycline gel in patients with papulopustular rosacea.The British journal of dermatology · 2020Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in patients with complicated intra-abdominal or skin and skin structure infections.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2006Trial
- A multicenter trial of the efficacy and safety of tigecycline versus imipenem/cilastatin in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections [Study ID Numbers: 3074A1-301-WW; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00081744].BMC infectious diseases · 2005Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Trial
- Eravacycline as a Novel Option for Treating Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Emergence of Tigecycline-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Harbouring tmexC6D6-toprJ1b From Hospital Sewage in Japan.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Eravacycline: From broad-spectrum coverage to novel clinical applications.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- The Action of Cannabidiol on Doxycycline Cytotoxicity in Human Cells-In Vitro Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Deregulation of mitochondrial gene expression in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.British journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Third-Generation Tetracyclines: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Potential.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- The advances in adjuvant therapy for tuberculosis with immunoregulatory compounds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- The In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Efficacy of Minocycline for the Treatment ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- [Acute Pancreatitis Related to Tigecycline in ICU Burn Patients].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2023Article
- Tigecycline Immunodetection Using Developed Group-Specific and Selective Antibodies for Drug Monitoring Purposes.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Overcoming intrinsic resistance in gram-negative bacteria using small molecule adjuvants.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2023Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tetracycline class of antimicrobials exhibit a broad-spectrum of activity against numerous pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as atypical organisms. These compounds are bacteriostatic, and act by binding to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit and inhibiting protein synthesis. The tetracyclines have been used successfully for the treatment of a variety of infectious diseases including community-acquired respiratory tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases, as well in the management of acne. The use of tetracyclines for treating bacterial infections has been limited in recent years because of the emergence of resistant organisms with efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms of resistance. Research to find tetracycline analogues that circumvented these resistance mechanisms has lead to the development of the glycylcyclines. The most developed glycylcycline is the 9-tert-butyl-glycylamido derivative of minocycline, otherwise known as tigecycline (GAR-936). The glycylcyclines exhibit antibacterial activities typical of earlier tetracyclines, but with more potent activity against tetracycline-resistant organisms with efflux and ribosomal protection mechanisms of resistance. The glycylcyclines are active against other resistant pathogens including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Tigecycline is only available in an injectable formulation for clinical use unlike currently marketed tetracyclines that are available in oral dosage forms. Tigecycline has a significantly larger volume of distribution (> 10 L/kg) than the other tetracyclines (range of 0.14 to 1.6 L/kg). Protein binding is approximately 68%. Presently no human data are available describing the tissue penetration of tigecycline, although studies in rats using radiolabelled tigecycline demonstrated good penetration into tissues. Tigecycline has a half-life of 36 hours in humans, less than 15% of tigecycline is excreted unchanged in the urine. On the basis of available data, it does not appear that the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline are markedly influenced by patient gender or age. The pharmacodynamic parameter that best correlates with bacteriological eradication is time above minimum inhibitory concentration. Several animal studies have been published describing the efficacy of tigecycline. Human phase 1 and 2 clinical trials have been completed for tigecycline. Phase 2 studies have been conducted in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections, and in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections have been published as abstracts. Both studies concluded that tigecycline was efficacious and well tolerated. Few human data are available regarding the adverse effects or drug interactions resulting from tigecycline therapy; however, preliminary data report that tigecycline can be safely used, is well tolerated and that the adverse effects experienced were typical of the tetracyclines (i.e. nausea, vomiting and headache). Tigecycline appears to be a promising new antibacterial based on in vitro and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic activity; however more clinical data are needed to fully evaluate its potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.