Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14720327›Full record

ArticleCancer science2004

Nemo-like kinase suppresses a wide range of transcription factors, including nuclear factor-kappaB.

Jun Yasuda, Hideki Yokoo, Tesshi Yamada, Issay Kitabayashi, Takao Sekiya, Hitoshi Ichikawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atypical MAPKs in cancer.The FEBS journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic significance of nemo-like kinase (NLK) expression in patients with gallbladder cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Common variation in Nemo-like kinase is associated with risk of ovarian cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jun YasudaCancer Transcriptome Project, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. jyasuda@ncc.go.jp
Hideki Yokoo
Tesshi Yamada
Issay Kitabayashi
Takao Sekiya
Hitoshi Ichikawa
National Cancer Research Institute · GBMolecular Oncology (United States) · USNational Cancer Centre Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nemo-like kinase (NLK) is a serine/threonine kinase that suppresses the transcription activity of the beta-catenin-T-cell factor (TCF) complex through phosphorylation of TCF. Our previous study showed that NLK overexpression induces apoptosis in DLD-1 human colon cancer cells and that apoptosis induction presumably requires a mechanism other than the suppression of beta-catenin-TCF complex. Luciferase reporter gene assay with pNF-kappaB-Luc revealed that NLK could suppress transcription activity of NF-kappaB in a kinase-dependent manner. However, it appeared that transcription co-activators of NF-kappaB, such as CREB binding protein (CBP)/p300, were likely to be the direct targets of NLK, rather than NF-kappaB itself. Luciferase reporter gene analysis of GAL4-CBP fusion proteins revealed that the C-terminal region of CBP was critical for transcription suppression by NLK. In vitro kinase assay showed that NLK could phosphorylate the C-terminal domain of CBP. However, HAT activity was not suppressed by the induction of wild-type NLK in DLD-1 cells. Furthermore, we observed that NLK suppressed the transcription activity of AP-1, Smad, and p53, all of which also utilize CBP as a co-activator. The extent of suppression by NLK was similar among the transcription factors tested (50-60% reduction). Our results suggest that NLK may suppress a wide range of gene expression, possibly through CBP.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsCREB-Binding ProteinFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression RegulationGenes, ReporterHumansI-kappa B KinaseImmunoblottingNF-kappa BNuclear ProteinsPrecipitin TestsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional ActivationTransfectionCHUK protein, humanCREB-Binding ProteinCREBBP protein, humanI-kappa B KinaseIKBKB protein, humanIKBKE protein, humanNF-kappa BNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID14720327
PMCPMC11158368
OpenAlexW2076650770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.