Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14720308›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2004

Identification and comparative analysis of components from the signal recognition particle in protozoa and fungi.

Magnus Alm Rosenblad, Christian Zwieb, Tore Samuelsson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Secretory Pathways inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Comparative genomics of microsporidian genomes reveals a minimal non-coding RNA set and new insights for transcription in minimal eukaryotic genomes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Exportin-5 mediates nuclear export of SRP RNA in vertebrates.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of the iron-responsive element.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2007
    Article
  15. Review
  16. The tmRDB and SRPDB resources.Nucleic acids research · 2006
    Article
  17. Evolutionary patterns of non-coding RNAs.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2005
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magnus Alm RosenbladDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Goteborg University, Box 440, SE-405 30 Goteborg, Sweden. magnus.alm@medkem.gu.se
Christian Zwieb
Tore Samuelsson
University of Gothenburg · SEThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF SRP RNAR01GM049034 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH CTR AT TYLER · PI ZWIEB, CHRISTIAN WOLFGANG · 1995 to 2006
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM49034NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein complex responsible for targeting proteins to the ER membrane. The SRP of metazoans is well characterized and composed of an RNA molecule and six polypeptides. The particle is organized into the S and Alu domains. The Alu domain has a translational arrest function and consists of the SRP9 and SRP14 proteins bound to the terminal regions of the SRP RNA. So far, our understanding of the SRP and its evolution in lower eukaryotes such as protozoa and yeasts has been limited. However, genome sequences of such organisms have recently become available, and we have now analyzed this information with respect to genes encoding SRP components.

resultsA number of SRP RNA and SRP protein genes were identified by an analysis of genomes of protozoa and fungi. The sequences and secondary structures of the Alu portion of the RNA were found to be highly variable. Furthermore, proteins SRP9/14 appeared to be absent in certain species. Comparative analysis of the SRP RNAs from different Saccharomyces species resulted in models which contain features shared between all SRP RNAs, but also a new secondary structure element in SRP RNA helix 5. Protein SRP21, previously thought to be present only in Saccharomyces, was shown to be a constituent of additional fungal genomes. Furthermore, SRP21 was found to be related to metazoan and plant SRP9, suggesting that the two proteins are functionally related.

conclusionsAnalysis of a number of not previously annotated SRP components show that the SRP Alu domain is subject to a more rapid evolution than the other parts of the molecule. For instance, the RNA portion is highly variable and the protein SRP9 seems to have evolved into the SRP21 protein in fungi. In addition, we identified a secondary structure element in the Saccharomyces RNA that has been inserted close to the Alu region. Together, these results provide important clues as to the structure, function and evolution of SRP.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceDatabases, GeneticEukaryotaFungal ProteinsFungiGenome, FungalGenome, ProtozoanMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationPhylogenyProtozoan ProteinsRNA, FungalRNA, ProtozoanSequence AlignmentFungal ProteinsProtozoan ProteinsRNA, FungalRNA, ProtozoanSignal Recognition Particle

Identifiers

PMID14720308
PMCPMC331402
OpenAlexW1784039167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.