Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14715759›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Validation of roche COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in rectal and pharyngeal specimens by an omp1 PCR assay.

N A Lister, S N Tabrizi, C K Fairley, S Garland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in the era of genomic medicine.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sexually transmitted proctitis.Postgraduate medical journal · 2006
    Review
  10. Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N A ListerDepartment of Public Health, The University of Melbourne, Royal Women's Hospital, Women's and Children's Health, Melbourne, Australia.
S N Tabrizi
C K Fairley
S Garland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening guidelines for men who have sex with men (MSM) recommend testing of extragenital sites (pharyngeal and rectal) for gonorrhoea and chlamydia. Testing of specimens from these sites is not validated by most commercial nucleic amplification tests, such as the COBAS Amplicor assay. To investigate the utility of the COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in extragenital specimens, this study developed and evaluated confirmatory tests using the omp1 gene as an alternative target for amplification by PCR. Of anal and throat swabs collected from men in male-only saunas, 52 swabs that tested C. trachomatis positive by COBAS Amplicor and 30 swabs that tested as negative were included for confirmatory omp1 PCR testing. A total of 49 (94%) COBAS Amplicor-positive samples were confirmed by the omp1 PCR. A substantial proportion of specimens were confirmed by using a nested omp1 PCR (27%). Not confirmed by any omp1 PCR were three anal swabs (6%). It is most probable that these samples contained lower bacterial levels that were near or below the detection level of the omp1 PCR assays. The findings of this study support the confident reporting of C. trachomatis detected by COBAS Amplicor in extragenital specimens and support the utility of this assay as a screening test for MSM.

Indexed as

Chlamydia trachomatisHumansMalePharynxPolymerase Chain ReactionPorinsRectumomp1 protein, Chlamydia trachomatisPorins

Identifiers

PMID14715759
PMCPMC321736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.