Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1471468›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica1992

In situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes: sensitive and reliable detection method applied to myelinating rat brain.

H Breitschopf, G Suchanek, R M Gould, D R Colman, H Lassmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Recent Advances in High-sensitivityActa histochemica et cytochemica · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Functional genetic targeting of embryonic kidney progenitor cells ex vivo.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H BreitschopfResearch Unit for Experimental Neuropathology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna.
G Suchanek
R M Gould
D R Colman
H Lassmann
Austrian Academy of Sciences · ATColumbia University · USNew York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method for in situ hybridization of digoxigenin-labeled cDNA and cRNA probes to myelin protein mRNA is described. This technique has dual advantages of high structural resolution and high sensitivity and avoids problems associated with handling of radioactive materials. Furthermore, it can be readily combined in double labeling with immunocytochemical protein detection. We have used this technique to detect and locate mRNA for myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid protein (PLP), 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'-phosphodiesterase (CNPase) and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) in oligodendrocytes of 7-day-old and adult rat brains. PLP and MAG mRNA were restricted to the perinuclear cytoplasm, whereas MBP and CNPase mRNA was additionally present in peripheral oligodendrocyte processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryDigoxigeninDNA ProbesHydrolysisImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationMyelin ProteinsMyelin SheathProtein DenaturationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRNA, MessengerRNA ProbesTissue EmbeddingTissue FixationDigoxigeninDNA ProbesMyelin ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID1471468
OpenAlexW2048907346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.