ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2003
Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Usability of Health Information Websites Designed for Adolescents: Systematic Review, Neurodevelopmental Model, and Design Brief.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2011Pooled it
- Teaching Australian high school students to think critically about health claims: a cluster randomized trial.Health education research · 2023Trial
- Are Disease Awareness Links on Prescription Drug Websites Misleading? A Randomized Study.Journal of health communication · 2016Trial
- The effect of improved readability scores on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2007Trial
- How Well Do "Dr. Google" and "Professor YouTube" Answer Health Questions for Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Caregivers?Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Peer health literacy level and health literacy among school-aged children and adolescents: a multilevel moderated mediation model of internet health information acquisition.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The relationship between social support, e-Health literacy, sleep quality and Internet addiction disorder in college students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Readability assessment of patient education materials on autonomic dysreflexia.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- A Risk Taxonomy and Reflection Tool for Large Language Model Adoption in Public Health.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2025Article
- The Paradigm Shift From Patient to Health Consumer: 20 Years of Value Assessment in Health.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A study on information perception and engagement, emphasizing the essential role of E-clinics among Palestinian adolescents.PloS one · 2025Article
- Quality Assessment of Internet Information Regarding Periodontitis in Persons Living with HIV.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023Article
- Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Health Misinformation Across Multiple Digital Ecologies: Qualitative Study of Data From Interviews With International Students.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Data sharing in the age of predictive psychiatry: an adolescent perspective.Evidence-based mental health · 2022Article
- Article
- Superlatives, clickbaits, appeals to authority, poor grammar, or boldface: Is editorial style related to the credibility of online health messages?Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Sociocultural, health knowledge, and health literacy among children ages 9-10 years in Thailand.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescents' access to health information on the Internet is partly a function of their ability to search for and find answers to their health-related questions. Adolescents may have unique health and computer literacy needs. Although many surveys, interviews, and focus groups have been utilized to understand the information-seeking and information-retrieval behavior of adolescents looking for health information online, we were unable to locate observations of individual adolescents that have been conducted in this context.
objectiveThis study was designed to understand how adolescents search for health information using the Internet and what implications this may have on access to health information.
methodsA convenience sample of 12 students (age 12-17 years) from 1 middle school and 2 high schools in southeast Michigan were provided with 6 health-related questions and asked to look for answers using the Internet. Researchers recorded 68 specific searches using software that captured screen images as well as synchronized audio recordings. Recordings were reviewed later and specific search techniques and strategies were coded. A qualitative review of the verbal communication was also performed.
resultsOut of 68 observed searches, 47 (69%) were successful in that the adolescent found a correct and useful answer to the health question. The majority of sites that students attempted to access were retrieved directly from search engine results (77%) or a search engine's recommended links (10%); only a small percentage were directly accessed (5%) or linked from another site (7%). The majority (83%) of followed links from search engine results came from the first 9 results. Incorrect spelling (30 of 132 search terms), number of pages visited within a site (ranging from 1-15), and overall search strategy (eg, using a search engine versus directly accessing a site), were each important determinants of success. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants used a trial-and-error approach to formulate search strings, scanned pages randomly instead of systematically, and did not consider the source of the content when searching for health information.
conclusionsThis study provides a useful snapshot of current adolescent searching patterns. The results have implications for constructing realistic simulations of adolescent search behavior, improving distribution and usefulness of Web sites with health information relevant to adolescents, and enhancing educators' knowledge of what specific pitfalls students are likely to encounter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.