Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14713653›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2003

Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study.

Derek L Hansen, Holly A Derry, Paul J Resnick, Caroline R Richardson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The effect of improved readability scores on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2007
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Risk Taxonomy and Reflection Tool for Large Language Model Adoption in Public Health.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quality Assessment of Internet Information Regarding Periodontitis in Persons Living with HIV.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Derek L HansenSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. shakmatt@umich.edu
Holly A Derry
Paul J Resnick
Caroline R Richardson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents' access to health information on the Internet is partly a function of their ability to search for and find answers to their health-related questions. Adolescents may have unique health and computer literacy needs. Although many surveys, interviews, and focus groups have been utilized to understand the information-seeking and information-retrieval behavior of adolescents looking for health information online, we were unable to locate observations of individual adolescents that have been conducted in this context.

objectiveThis study was designed to understand how adolescents search for health information using the Internet and what implications this may have on access to health information.

methodsA convenience sample of 12 students (age 12-17 years) from 1 middle school and 2 high schools in southeast Michigan were provided with 6 health-related questions and asked to look for answers using the Internet. Researchers recorded 68 specific searches using software that captured screen images as well as synchronized audio recordings. Recordings were reviewed later and specific search techniques and strategies were coded. A qualitative review of the verbal communication was also performed.

resultsOut of 68 observed searches, 47 (69%) were successful in that the adolescent found a correct and useful answer to the health question. The majority of sites that students attempted to access were retrieved directly from search engine results (77%) or a search engine's recommended links (10%); only a small percentage were directly accessed (5%) or linked from another site (7%). The majority (83%) of followed links from search engine results came from the first 9 results. Incorrect spelling (30 of 132 search terms), number of pages visited within a site (ranging from 1-15), and overall search strategy (eg, using a search engine versus directly accessing a site), were each important determinants of success. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants used a trial-and-error approach to formulate search strings, scanned pages randomly instead of systematically, and did not consider the source of the content when searching for health information.

conclusionsThis study provides a useful snapshot of current adolescent searching patterns. The results have implications for constructing realistic simulations of adolescent search behavior, improving distribution and usefulness of Web sites with health information relevant to adolescents, and enhancing educators' knowledge of what specific pitfalls students are likely to encounter.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAdolescentComputer LiteracyComputer SimulationEthnicityFemaleHealth EducationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetMaleMedical InformaticsObservationRacial GroupsReimbursement Mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID14713653
PMCPMC1550572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.