Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14713401›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2004

The use of glucosamine therapy in osteoarthritis.

Djamila Zerkak, Maxime Dougados

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Djamila ZerkakRheumatology B Department, René Descartes University, AP-HP Cochin Hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, Paris 75014, France.
Maxime Dougados
Délégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glucosamine products have been used extensively for the management of pain in osteoarthritis. This paper reviews the most recent clinical and experimental studies regarding its efficacy and safety. Although clinical trials include methodologic flaws and publication bias, glucosamine is likely an effective therapy for the symptomatic management of osteoarthritis. In turn, definite proof for chondromodulating effect requires well-conducted clinical trials. In North America, glucosamine is an over-the-counter dietary supplement and preparations made by different manufacturers may vary. There is also a need to standardize this therapy and allow practitioners to give patients suitable advice. An ongoing long-term clinical trial in the US will possibly permit to investigate the clinical relevance of these results and give appropriate recommendations.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularGlucosamineHumansOsteoarthritisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeGlucosamine

Identifiers

PMID14713401
OpenAlexW2062814924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.