Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14711410›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2004

Relative contribution of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death to survival after DNA damage in Drosophila larvae.

Burnley R Jaklevic, Tin Tin Su

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SVC112: From Hummingbirds to Head and Neck Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Size compensation inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Cyclin E overexpression in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Burnley R JaklevicMCD Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Tin Tin Su
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Cell Cycle Regulation by Checkpoints in DrosophilaR01GM066441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2002 to 2006
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066441NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 66441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComponents of the DNA damage checkpoint are essential for surviving exposure to DNA damaging agents. Checkpoint activation leads to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis in eukaryotes. Cell cycle regulation and DNA repair appear essential for unicellular systems to survive DNA damage. The relative importance of these responses and apoptosis for surviving DNA damage in multicellular organisms remains unclear.

resultsAfter exposure to ionizing radiation, wild-type Drosophila larvae regulate the cell cycle and repair DNA; grp (DmChk1) mutants cannot regulate the cell cycle but repair DNA; okra (DmRAD54) mutants regulate the cell cycle but are deficient in repair of double strand breaks (DSB); mei-41 (DmATR) mutants cannot regulate the cell cycle and are deficient in DSB repair. All undergo radiation-induced apoptosis. p53 mutants regulate the cell cycle but fail to undergo apoptosis. Of these, mutants deficient in DNA repair, mei-41 and okra, show progressive degeneration of imaginal discs and die as pupae, while other genotypes survive to adulthood after irradiation. Survival is accompanied by compensatory growth of imaginal discs via increased nutritional uptake and cell proliferation, presumably to replace dead cells.

conclusionsDNA repair is essential for surviving radiation as expected; surprisingly, cell cycle regulation and p53-dependent cell death are not. We propose that processes resembling regeneration of discs act to maintain tissues and ultimately determine survival after irradiation, thus distinguishing requirements between muticellular and unicellular eukaryotes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBromodeoxyuridineCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCell DeathCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEgg ProteinsImmunohistochemistryLarvaMicroscopy, FluorescenceBromodeoxyuridineCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1DNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsEgg Proteinsgrp protein, DrosophilaMei-41 protein, DrosophilaProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID14711410
PMCPMC10211499
OpenAlexW2020271376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.