Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14709515›Full record

ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2004

Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

D Dobie, J Gray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. NVC-422 topical gel for the treatment of impetigo.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial-loaded cements and beads in orthopedic trauma and arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D DobieDepartment of Microbiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK.
J Gray

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarises current knowledge of the microbiological and clinical aspects of fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, and makes recommendations about fusidic acid prescribing and further research.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialFusidic AcidHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Staphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsFusidic Acid

Identifiers

PMID14709515
PMCPMC1755935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.