Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14704658›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2004

Combined standard graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors.

C Kasper, H G Sayer, L O Mügge, K Schilling, S Scholl, M C Issa, K Höffken

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in the treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Pathogenesis and management of graft-versus-host disease.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  9. Should methotrexate plus calcineurin inhibitors be considered standard of care for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease?Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2010
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C KasperDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Oncology-Hematology), Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. christoph.kasper@med.uni-jena.de
H G Sayer
L O Mügge
K Schilling
S Scholl
M C Issa
K Höffken
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this open single-centre phase II study, MMF was added on day +10 after allogeneic transplantation to standard immunosuppressive prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporine and methotrexate to decrease the incidence of GvHD. In all, 30 patients aged 20-59 years with advanced haematological malignancies received an unmanipulated blood-stem-cell graft (median of 8.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) and 349 x 10(6) CD3(+) cells per bodyweight) from matched unrelated (n=26), or mismatched donors (n=4). Prior to transplantation, 13 patients underwent fractionated total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide, one patient additional etoposide. In all, 16 patients received reduced conditioning of fludarabin, busulfan, and antithymocyte globulin. All patients engrafted in a median of 12 days, and 19 developed acute GvHD>/=II, including two patients with GvHD III and three with GvHD IV. Subsequently, nine patients developed limited and two patients extensive chronic GvHD. With a median follow-up of 28 months, the overall survival is 53.3% and disease-free survival 50%, respectively. Only two deaths were due to GvHD IV. Out of 13 patients, 10 being CMV IgG positive became positive for pp65. In conclusion, this MMF schedule seems to be safe and feasible in the prophylaxis of severe acute GvHD for high-risk patients, restricted by an increased risk for reactivating CMV in seropositive patients.

Indexed as

AdultBlood DonorsCyclosporineCytomegalovirusGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMethotrexateMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationTime FactorsTransplantation, HomologousVirus ActivationCyclosporineMethotrexateMycophenolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID14704658
OpenAlexW2051529579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.