Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14704184›Full record

ArticleGenetics2003

Genetics of P-element transposition into Drosophila melanogaster centric heterochromatin.

Alexander Y Konev, Christopher M Yan, David Acevedo, Cameron Kennedy, Elaina Ward, Arlene Lim, Sanjay Tickoo, Gary H Karpen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ribosomal DNA contributes to global chromatin regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander Y KonevMolecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, CA 92037, USA.
Christopher M Yan
David Acevedo
Cameron Kennedy
Elaina Ward
Arlene Lim
Sanjay Tickoo
Gary H Karpen
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

The Drosophila Heterochromatin Genome ProjectR01HG000747 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KARPEN, GARY H · 1992 to 2008
$9.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000747NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG00747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterochromatin is a major component of higher eukaryotic genomes, but progress in understanding the molecular structure and composition of heterochromatin has lagged behind the production of relatively complete euchromatic genome sequences. The introduction of single-copy molecular-genetic entry points can greatly facilitate structure and sequence analysis of heterochromatic regions that are rich in repeated DNA. In this study, we report the isolation of 502 new P-element insertions into Drosophila melanogaster centric heterochromatin, generated in nine different genetic screens that relied on mosaic silencing (position-effect variegation, or PEV) of the yellow gene present in the transposon. The highest frequencies of recovery of variegating insertions were observed when centric insertions were used as the source for mobilization. We propose that the increased recovery of variegating insertions from heterochromatic starting sites may result from the physical proximity of different heterochromatic regions in germline nuclei or from the association of mobilizing elements with heterochromatin proteins. High frequencies of variegating insertions were also recovered when a potent suppressor of PEV (an extra Y chromosome) was present in both the mobilization and selection generations, presumably due to the effects of chromatin structure on P-element mobilization, insertion, and phenotypic selection. Finally, fewer variegating insertions were recovered after mobilization in females, in comparison to males, which may reflect differences in heterochromatin structure in the female and male germlines. FISH localization of a subset of the insertions confirmed that 98% of the variegating lines contain heterochromatic insertions and that these schemes produce a broader distribution of insertion sites. The results of these schemes have identified the most efficient methods for generating centric heterochromatin P insertions. In addition, the large collection of insertions produced by these screens provides molecular-genetic entry points for mapping, sequencing, and functional analysis of Drosophila heterochromatin.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsAnimalsChromosomesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGerm CellsHeterochromatinIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMalePhenotypeSelection, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila ProteinsHeterochromatiny protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID14704184
PMCPMC1462875
OpenAlexW2108166262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.