Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14704182›Full record

ArticleGenetics2003

Recruitment of the proneural gene scute to the Drosophila sex-determination pathway.

Lisa A Wrischnik, John R Timmer, Lisa A Megna, Thomas W Cline

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting X chromosomes for repression.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2010
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa A WrischnikDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204, USA.
John R Timmer
Lisa A Megna
Thomas W Cline
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

REGULATION OF SEX-SPECIFIC GENES IN DROSOPHILAR01GM023468 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CLINE, THOMAS W · 1986 to 2006
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-23468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In flies, scute (sc) works with its paralogs in the achaete-scute-complex (ASC) to direct neuronal development. However, in the family Drosophilidae, sc also acquired a role in the primary event of sex determination, X chromosome counting, by becoming an X chromosome signal element (XSE)-an evolutionary step shown here to have occurred after sc diverged from its closest paralog, achaete (ac). Two temperature-sensitive alleles, sc(sisB2) and sc(sisB3), which disrupt only sex determination, were recovered in a powerful F1 genetic selection and used to investigate how sc was recruited to the sex-determination pathway. sc(sisB2) revealed 3' nontranscribed regulatory sequences likely to be involved. The sc(sisB2) lesion abolished XSE activity when combined with mutations engineered in a sequence upstream of all XSEs. In contrast, changes in Sc protein sequence seem not to have been important for recruitment. The observation that the other new allele, sc(sisB3), eliminates the C-terminal half of Sc without affecting neurogenesis and that sc(sisB1), the most XSE-specific allele previously available, is a nonsense mutant, would seem to suggest the opposite, but we show that housefly Sc can substitute for fruit fly Sc in sex determination, despite lacking Drosophilidae-specific conserved residues in its C-terminal half. Lack of synergistic lethality among mutations in sc, twist, and dorsal argue against a proposed role for sc in mesoderm formation that had seemed potentially relevant to sex-pathway recruitment. The screen that yielded new sc alleles also generated autosomal duplications that argue against the textbook view that fruit fly sex signal evolution recruited a set of autosomal signal elements comparable to the XSEs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalSex Determination ProcessesSignal TransductionAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBiological EvolutionCodon, NonsenseDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, LethalMaleMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedCodon, NonsenseDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinssc protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID14704182
PMCPMC1462923
OpenAlexW2129598107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.