Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14704156›Full record

ArticleGenetics2003

A conservative test of genetic drift in the endosymbiotic bacterium Buchnera: slightly deleterious mutations in the chaperonin groEL.

Joshua T Herbeck, Daniel J Funk, Patrick H Degnan, Jennifer J Wernegreen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What Is Speciation?PLoS genetics · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Endosymbiosis and its implications for evolutionary theory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DNA variation and symbiotic associations in phenotypically diverse sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua T HerbeckJosephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA.
Daniel J Funk
Patrick H Degnan
Jennifer J Wernegreen

Funding

MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF ENDOSYMBIOSISR01GM062626 · NIGMS · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI WERNEGREEN, JENNIFER JO · 2001 to 2010
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM62626-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obligate endosymbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola shows elevated rates of sequence evolution compared to free-living relatives, particularly at nonsynonymous sites. Because Buchnera experiences population bottlenecks during transmission to the offspring of its aphid host, it is hypothesized that genetic drift and the accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations can explain this rate increase. Recent studies of intraspecific variation in Buchnera reveal patterns consistent with this hypothesis. In this study, we examine inter- and intraspecific nucleotide variation in groEL, a highly conserved chaperonin gene that is constitutively overexpressed in Buchnera. Maximum-likelihood estimates of nonsynonymous substitution rates across Buchnera species are strikingly low at groEL compared to other loci. Despite this evidence for strong purifying selection on groEL, our intraspecific analysis of this gene documents reduced synonymous polymorphism, elevated nonsynonymous polymorphism, and an excess of rare alleles relative to the neutral expectation, as found in recent studies of other Buchnera loci. Comparisons with Escherichia coli generally show patterns predicted by their differences in N(e). The sum of these observations is not expected under relaxed or balancing selection, selective sweeps, or increased mutation rate. Rather, they further support the hypothesis that drift is an important force driving accelerated protein evolution in this obligate mutualist.

Indexed as

Genetic DriftMutationSelection, GeneticBuchneraChaperonin 60Evolution, MolecularGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataSymbiosisChaperonin 60

Identifiers

PMID14704156
PMCPMC1462895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.