Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14703521›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Open access publishing takes off.

Tony Delamothe, Richard Smith

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Publishing in open access journals.Insights into imaging · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research: the first ten years.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The joys and challenges of being an open-access medical journal.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2007
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Open access publication is growing in importance.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2005
    Article
  8. Open access publishing: too much oxygen?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tony Delamothe
Richard Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

InternetPeriodicals as TopicPublishing

Identifiers

PMID14703521
PMCPMC313879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.