ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: are they accurate?
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing Patient and System Delays in Women with Breast Cancer in Morocco: A Systematic Review.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.Public health genomics · 2014Trial
- Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Breast cancer awareness among women in the Syrian Coast: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"Journal of health communication · 2020Article
- Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Study protocol: Randomized controlled trial of web-based decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase breast cancer chemoprevention.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2019Article
- A Risk Assessment Comparison of Breast Cancer and Factors Affected to Risk Perception of Women in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2017Article
- Breast cancer risk perceptions of Turkish women attending primary care: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2014Article
- Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.JAMA internal medicine · 2014Observational
- Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Causal attribution among cancer survivors of the 10 most common cancers.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2011Article
- Recruitment to a physical activity intervention study in women at increased risk of breast cancer.BMC medical research methodology · 2009Article
- Predictors of Breast Cancer Worry in a Hispanic and Predominantly Immigrant Mammography Screening Population.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to compare women's personal estimates of their risk with objective breast cancer risk estimates and to describe the risk factors for breast cancer identified by women.
methodsTelephone survey of a random sample of 761 rural and urban women with no history of breast cancer. Survey instrument included measures of perceptions of lifetime risk for breast cancer for themselves and for the average woman, perceptions of risk factors that influenced their risk and the average woman's risk for breast cancer. Objective estimates of breast cancer risk were calculated using the Gail et al. algorithm. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data.
resultsWomen's estimates of their own lifetime risk for breast cancer were significantly higher than their Gail model risk estimates (mean difference = 19%, p < 0.001). The women's personal breast cancer risk estimates were lower than estimates of risk for a hypothetical average woman (mean difference = -8%, p < 0.001). Fifty percent of the sample reported a perceived risk estimate at least 15% above their Gail risk estimate. The risk factors for breast cancer most frequently identified included family history, nutrition/diet, smoking, lifestyle, environment, stress and age. Although the risk factors used to calculate the Gail model risk estimates were reported by some study participants, these women consistently identified only family history as their personal risk factor.
conclusionWomen have difficulty accurately estimating their breast cancer risk and identifying known risk factors for breast cancer. Individual risk information may be more useful in enhancing accurate risk perceptions than the "1 in 9" message.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14700240PMC6980131W1585481496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.