Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14698934›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Off to a good start: the influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility, and nutrition on children's health.

Robert E Chapin, Wendie A Robbins, Laura A Schieve, Anne M Sweeney, Sonia A Tabacova, Kay M Tomashek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert E ChapinPfizer Global Research and Development, Safety Sciences, Eastern Point Road, MS 8274-1336, Groton, CT 06340, USA. robert_e_chapin@groton.pfizer.com
Wendie A Robbins
Laura A Schieve
Anne M Sweeney
Sonia A Tabacova
Kay M Tomashek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific community is developing a compelling body of evidence that shows the importance of the in utero environment (including chemical and hormonal levels) to the ultimate health of the child and even of the aging adult. This article summarizes the evidence that shows this impact begins with conception. Only a full life-cycle evaluation will help us understand these impacts, and only such an understanding will produce logically prioritized mitigation strategies to address the greatest threats first. Clearly, the time for analysis begins when the next generation is but a twinkle in the eye.

Indexed as

Child WelfareFertilityMaternal ExposureNutritional StatusPaternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultChildChild, PreschoolCongenital AbnormalitiesEmbryonic and Fetal DevelopmentEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFertilizationHumansInfantEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID14698934
PMCPMC1241800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.