ArticleAtencion primaria2003
[Calculation of coronary risk in the 35-60 year old population registered at a health centre].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Effectiveness of an intervention to improve quality care in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertense patients].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo stratify the population between 35 and 60 years old according to their coronary risk (CR) and to identify the modifiable cardiovascular risk factors that affect our population.
designTransversal, descriptive study.
settingCabañaquinta Health Centre, in a rural health district in Asturias area VII.Participants. Simple randomised sampling based on the health cards of the population between 35 and 60 years old assigned to a health centre. Total number of people included was 205, and 95 did not reply. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The variables were: age, sex, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, tobacco dependency, diabetes, hypertension treatment, treatment for lipaemia, and personal background of cardiovascular disease (CVD). CR was calculated with the ATP-III tables (Adult Treatment Panel III). High CR was understood as over 20% likelihood of developing CVD or having recurrent episodes of CVD in the next 10 years.
resultsA simple descriptive study was conducted. 53% were women; mean age was 48. 37% were smokers, 27% with lipaemia and 29% with hypertension. Mean systolic pressure was 126 mm Hg, mean diastolic pressure was 80 mm Hg. Cholesterol was 213 mg/dL (confidence interval [CI], 174-252), HDL-cholesterol 52.64 mg/dL (CI, 39.94-65.34), LDL-cholesterol 139 mg/dL (CI, 104-174) and triglycerides 106.02 mg/dL (CI, 19.72-192.32). 45% of the sample had two or more CV risk factors. Mean CV risk in the population was 5.3% (CI, <1%-11.3%). According to the table used, 2% of the population had high CR.
conclusionsMost of our population had moderate risk. The most common group of patients is a young woman smoker with moderate risk. Tobacco is the most prevalent modifiable risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.