Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14694903›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2003

Comparative sequence analysis of a single-gene conserved segment in mouse and human.

James W Thomas, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Eric D Green

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-alignment of orthologous genome regions in five species provides new insights into the evolutionary make-up of mammalian genomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James W ThomasDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael St, Suite 301 Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. jthomas@genetics.emory.edu
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program
Eric D Green
Emory University · US

Funding

Inter- and Intra-Species Comparative SequencingZIBHG000196 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI THOMAS, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$177.6M
Multi-Species Comparative Sequencing of Targeted GenomicZ01HG000196 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2001 to 2008
$19.1M
Structural /Functional Analysis of Mammalian ChromosomesZ01HG000060 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 1995 to 2008
$6.8M
Structural and Functional Analysis of Mammalian ChromosomesZIAHG000060 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GREEN, ERIC · 2009 to 2010
$4.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative mapping and sequencing of the mouse and human genomes have defined large, conserved chromosomal segments in which gene content and order are highly conserved. These regions span megabase-sized intervals and together comprise the vast majority of both genomes. However, the evolutionary relationships among the small remaining portions of these genomes are not as well characterized. Here we describe the sequencing and annotation of a 341-kb region of mouse Chr 2 containing nine genes, including biliverdin reductase A (Blvra), and its comparison with the orthologous regions of the human and rat genomes. These analyses reveal that the known conserved synteny between mouse Chromosome (Chr) 2 and human Chr 7 reflects an interval containing one gene (Blvra/BLVRA) that is, at most, just 34 kb in the mouse genome. In the mouse, this segment is flanked proximally by genes orthologous to human chromosome 15q21 and distally by genes orthologous to human Chr 2q11. The observed differences between the human and mouse genomes likely resulted from one or more rearrangements in the rodent lineage. In addition to the resulting changes in gene order and location, these rearrangements also appear to have included genomic deletions that led to the loss of at least one gene in the rodent lineage. Finally, we also have identified a recent mouse-specific segmental duplication. These finding illustrate that small genomic regions outside the large mouse-human conserved segments can contain a single gene as well as sequences that are apparently unique to one genome.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomeAnimalsChromosomes, Human, Pair 15Conserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene DeletionHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group DonorsRatsbiliverdin reductaseOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group Donors

Identifiers

PMID14694903
OpenAlexW1996711104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.