ReviewDer Internist2003
[Therapy of severe fungal infections].
Review in Der Internist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conazoles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010Review
- Successful management of invasive pulmonary nocardiosis and aspergillosis in a patient with T-cell lymphoma: a case report.Clinical medicine. Case reports · 2008Article
- [Diagnostics and therapy for invasive fungal infections in an intensive care unit].Der Anaesthesist · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe fungal infections increase in numbers in the Western world. This is due to more intensive therapies against cancers leading to severe and prolonged immunosuppression. For many years treatment of severe fungal infections had to be done solely with amphothericin B desoxycholate and 5-fluorocytosine. With the advent of triazoles such as fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B and the development of echinocandines such as caspofungin also severe candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis has become treatable. In particular, caspofungin for invasive candidiasis and voriconazole for invasive aspergillosis seem at least equivalent to amphotericin B. A clear advantage is the advent of lipid formulations of amphotericin B. This regards especially side effects which are reduced with these newer formulations, i.e. nephrotoxicity. Due to the fact that prospective trials are difficult to conduct because patient populations may vary considerably (especially the underlying disease) many comparisons were not yet performed. Nevertheless, promising results indicate that certain combinations of antifungals may enhance prognosis of refractory fungal infections with a so far very serious prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.