ReviewDer Internist2003
[Therapy and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with vitamin K antagonists].
Review in Der Internist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Treatment of deep vein thrombosis. When to use which substance?].Der Internist · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K-antagonists is very effective in secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. In Germany, most commonly Phenprocoumon is used, while most of the evidence-based data are available for Warfarin. The initial treatment of acute venous thromboembolism requires immediate anticoagulation with heparin and a subsequent overlapping treatment with oral anticoagulants. During this phase, anticoagulation may be unstable with increased risk for bleeding. An INR target range between 2 and 3 provides effective protection with minimal risk for major bleeding. The individual risk for bleeding may be estimated by a clinical score. Six months of oral anticoagulation is the standard duration for a first episode of venous thromboembolism, while recurrencies are treated for at least one to two years. The duration may be tailored to the individual patient according to underlying risk factors for recurrencies and for bleeding. Because of a plethora of practical problems and the narrow therapeutic window, there is a need for new antithrombotic agents. These may allow a longer duration of secondary prevention with improved protection against recurrencies without sacrificing safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14689191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.