Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14689191›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2003

[Therapy and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with vitamin K antagonists].

R M Bauersachs

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R M BauersachsMedizinische Klinik IV, Max-Ratschow-Klinik für Angiologie, Städtisches Klinikum Darmstadt. Rupert.Bauersachs@Klinikum-Darmstadt.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral anticoagulation with vitamin-K-antagonists is very effective in secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. In Germany, most commonly Phenprocoumon is used, while most of the evidence-based data are available for Warfarin. The initial treatment of acute venous thromboembolism requires immediate anticoagulation with heparin and a subsequent overlapping treatment with oral anticoagulants. During this phase, anticoagulation may be unstable with increased risk for bleeding. An INR target range between 2 and 3 provides effective protection with minimal risk for major bleeding. The individual risk for bleeding may be estimated by a clinical score. Six months of oral anticoagulation is the standard duration for a first episode of venous thromboembolism, while recurrencies are treated for at least one to two years. The duration may be tailored to the individual patient according to underlying risk factors for recurrencies and for bleeding. Because of a plethora of practical problems and the narrow therapeutic window, there is a need for new antithrombotic agents. These may allow a longer duration of secondary prevention with improved protection against recurrencies without sacrificing safety.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInternational Normalized RatioMalePregnancyPulmonary EmbolismRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionVenous ThrombosisVitamin KAnticoagulantsVitamin K

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.