Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14689079›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2003

[Drug interactions. Mechanisms and clinical relevance].

U Klotz, W Beil, C Gleiter, B Drewelow, E Garbe, A Gillessen, E Mutschler

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Drug interactions in geriatric medicine].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2009
    Review
  3. Improvement in the handling of drug-drug interactions.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008
    Article
  4. [Reflux esophagitis].Der Internist · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

U KlotzDr.-Margarete-Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart. ulrich.klotz@ikp-stuttgart.de
W Beil
C Gleiter
B Drewelow
E Garbe
A Gillessen
E Mutschler
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversitätsklinikum Tübingen · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last few years 3 important drugs (terfenadine, mibefradil, cisapride) had to been withdrawn from the market because of serious drug-drug interactions. Polypragmacy, not only in advanced age, is often applied. Consequently the possibility of pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug interactions has always to be taken into account which can cause adverse effects, therapeutic failures, hospital admissions and extra costs. Clinically relevant interactions can be observed especially on the level of drug metabolism and transport. Both pharmacokinetic processes can be induced or inhibited by numerous agents. Taking proton pump inhibitors as an example it could be shown that the various compounds can differ in their interaction potential.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacokineticsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Treatment FailureDrug TherapyHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID14689079
OpenAlexW2404070139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.