ReviewDer Internist2003
[Immunology of tuberculosis: impact on the development of novel vaccines].
Review in Der Internist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Tuberculosis of the parotid gland].HNO · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis is an ancient health problem that is still not under control worldwide. High infection rates with the etiologic pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, persisting within the host organism and waiting for the opportunity to disseminate when the immune system is suppressed, and the long and cost-intensive chemotherapeutic treatment urgently require the development of a novel vaccine. This article reviews the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection resulting in new strategies for the improvement of the available vaccine Mycobacterium bovis BCG or for the development of alternative vaccines. A new vaccine should elicit a better immune response than the natural infection and reliably protect from TB disease, regardless if given prior or post infection with M. tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.