Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2004
Freehand three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of the effect of telmisartan compared with hydrochlorothiazide on left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: a multicentre study.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2014Pooled it
- Diastolic blood pressure reduction contributes more to the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of human hypertension · 2013Pooled it
- Diuretics are Similar to Losartan on Echocardiographic Target-Organ Damage in Stage I Hypertension. PREVER-Treatment Study.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Trial
- First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Review
- New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Review
- Impact of telmisartan in modifying vascular risk.Integrated blood pressure control · 2010Article
- Is the fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide a good approach to treat hypertension?Vascular health and risk management · 2007Review
- Cardiovascular risk reduction by reversing endothelial dysfunction: ARBs, ACE inhibitors, or both? Expectations from the ONTARGET Trial Programme.Vascular health and risk management · 2007Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antihypertensive efficacy, effects on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and tolerability of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, were compared with those of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Adult patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and an optimal acoustic window by two-dimensional echocardiography were randomised at baseline to 12 months' double-blind, once-daily treatment with telmisartan 80 mg or HCTZ 25 mg. Two-dimensional echocardiography and freehand precordial three-dimensional echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were performed at baseline and after treatment. Of the 41 telmisartan group patients and 28 HCTZ group patients, 40 and 25, respectively, completed the study. Following treatment, 24-h mean SBP (telmisartan 157 +/- 11 vs 133 +/- 7 mmHg, P<0.001; HCTZ 154 +/- 10 vs 144 +/- 11 mmHg, P<0.003) and DBP (telmisartan 96 +/- 6 vs 83 +/- 5 mmHg, P<0.001; HCTZ 95 +/- 7 vs 87 +/- 8 mmHg, P<0.003) were significantly reduced. Telmisartan produced significantly greater 24-h mean SBP and DBP reductions than HCTZ (P<0.001). LVMI was significantly reduced by telmisartan (141 +/- 16 vs 125 +/- 19 g/m2, P<0.001), but not by HCTZ (139 +/- 20 vs 135 +/- 22 g/m(2)). Incidences of adverse events in both the treatment groups were low; two cases of hypokalaemia occurred with HCTZ. In conclusion, telmisartan 80 mg was well tolerated and significantly reduced SBP, DBP and LVMI after 12 months' treatment compared with HCTZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.