Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14688125›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

Brucella abortus rough mutants are cytopathic for macrophages in culture.

Jianwu Pei, Thomas A Ficht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Idiosyncratic Biogenesis of Intracellular Pathogens-Containing Vacuoles.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. A TractableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Lethality ofVirulence · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biology, Mechanism, and Structure of Enzymes in the α-d-Phosphohexomutase Superfamily.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Systems Biology Analysis of TemporalFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianwu PeiVeterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, Texas 77843-4467, USA.
Thomas A Ficht
Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station · US

Funding

Improved Brucella Vaccine StrainsR01AI048496 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI FICHT, THOMAS A · 2001 to 2009
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI48496-01A1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rough mutants of Brucella spp. are attenuated for survival in animal models. However, conflicting in vitro evidence has been obtained concerning the intracellular survival of rough mutants. Transposon-derived rough mutants isolated in our laboratory were previously shown to exhibit small but significant reductions in intracellular survival in a 12-h in vitro assay. Several recent publications report that rough mutants exhibited increased macrophage uptake relative to their smooth parental strains, and a reduction in numbers at the end of the assay has been interpreted as intracellular killing. In an effort to explore the role of O antigen in the interaction between Brucella abortus and macrophages, we have monitored the uptake of rough mutants and survival in vitro by using the murine macrophage cell line J774.A1. The results confirm a 10- to 20-fold-increased uptake of rough mutants over that of smooth organisms under standard conditions. Recovery of the rough mutants persisted up to 8 h postinfection, but at the point when intracellular replication of the smooth organisms was observed, the number of rough organisms recovered declined. Fluorescence microscopy revealed the intracellular multiplication of both smooth and rough organisms, and assays performed in the absence of antibiotic confirmed the replication of the rough organisms. Examination by phase-contrast microscopy revealed the lytic death of macrophages infected with the rough mutants, which was confirmed by the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from the cell cytoplasm. Thus, the decline in the number of rough organisms was the result of the lysis of macrophages and not from intracellular killing. The cytopathic effect is characterized as necrotic rather than apoptotic cell death based on early LDH release, annexin V and propidium iodide staining, morphological changes of infected cells and nuclei, and glycine protection. The cytopathic effect was observed with macrophages at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of as low as 20 and was not observed with epithelial cells at MOIs of as high as 2000. These findings suggest a role for O antigen during the early stages of host-agent interaction that is essential in establishing an intracellular niche that maintains and supports persistent intracellular infection resulting in disease.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsBrucella abortusCell LineMacrophagesMiceNecrosisVirulence

Identifiers

PMID14688125
PMCPMC343953
OpenAlexW2097754561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.