ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2003
Misperceptions about beta-blockers and diuretics: a national survey of primary care physicians.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis: impact of drug class on adherence to antihypertensives.Circulation · 2011Pooled it
- Are hypertensive elderly patients treated differently?Clinical interventions in aging · 2006Trial
- Variation in dermatologist beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2013Article
- What differentiates primary care physicians who predominantly prescribe diuretics for treating mild to moderate hypertension from those who do not? A comparative qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2012Article
- Neighborhood socioeconomic status, Medicaid coverage and medical management of myocardial infarction: atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) community surveillance.BMC public health · 2010Article
- Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Review
- Is patients' insurance coverage associated with prescribing after hospitalization for severe, poorly controlled hypertension?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008Article
- Patient and provider perceptions of hypertension treatment: do they agree?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007Article
- Clinical and nonclinical correlates of adherence to prescribing guidelines for hypertension in a large managed care organization.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2006Article
- The continuing evolution of women's health.Journal of general internal medicine · 2004Article
- Understanding and modifying physician behavior for prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003Article
- Impact of urbanization on the prevalence and pattern of arterial hypertension on the island of Socotra.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBased on a series of clinical trials showing no difference in the effectiveness or tolerability of most major classes of antihypertensive medications, the Joint National Commission on High Blood Pressure Treatment recommends that physicians prescribe beta-blockers or diuretics as initial hypertensive therapy unless there are compelling indications for another type of medication. Nevertheless, many physicians continue to favor more expensive medications like angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers as first line agents. The persistent use of these agents raises questions as to whether physicians perceive ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers to be better than beta-blockers and diuretics.
methodsWe surveyed 1,200 primary care physicians in 1997, and another 500 primary care physicians in 2000, and asked them to estimate the relative effectiveness and side effects of 4 classes of medication in treating a hypothetical patient with uncomplicated hypertension: ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. In addition, we asked them to indicate whether they ever provided free samples of hypertension medications to their patients.
resultsPerceptions of the relative effectiveness and side effects of the 4 classes of hypertension medications did not significantly change over the 3 years, nor did prescription recommendations. Physicians perceive that diuretics are less effective at lowering blood pressure than the other 3 classes (P <.001). They also perceive that beta-blockers are less tolerated than the other 3 classes (P <.001). In a multivariate model, perceptions of effectiveness and tolerability displayed significant associations with prescription preference independent of background variables. The only other variable to contribute significantly to the model was provision of free medication samples to patients.
conclusionsDespite numerous clinical trials showing no difference in the effectiveness or side-effect profiles of these 4 classes of drugs, most physicians believed that diuretics were less effective and beta-blockers were less tolerated than other medications. Moreover, their prescription practices were associated with their provision of free samples provided by pharmaceutical representatives, even after adjusting for other demographic characteristics. Efforts to increase physicians' prescribing of beta-blockers and diuretics may need to be directed at overcoming misunderstandings about the effectiveness and tolerability of these medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.