Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14686461›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2003

Evidence-based medicine and psychiatric practice.

Gregory E Gray, Letitia A Pinson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: possibilities, problems and limitations.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  8. Is evidence sufficient for evidence-based medicine?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Does evidence-based medicine apply to psychiatry?Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2007
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Principles of evidence based medicine.Archives of disease in childhood · 2005
    Article
  14. Understanding randomised controlled trials.Archives of disease in childhood · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory E GrayDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles 90059, USA. grgray@cdrewu.edu
Letitia A Pinson

Funding

MINORITY MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH AT CHARLES R DREW UNIVR24MH061456 · NIMH · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI GRAY, GREGORY E · 2001 to 2003
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS 5-R24-MH61456-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been defined as "the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients." EBM requires the ability to apply a knowledge of medical informatics (e.g., efficiently searching the medical literature) and clinical epidemiology (e.g., being able to critically appraise the literature) to the treatment of individual patients. This article provides an introduction to the history, philosophy, and methods of EBM as applied to psychiatric practice. The article summarizes the five-step EBM model: (1) formulate the question; (2) search for answers; (3) appraise the evidence; (4) apply the results; and (5) assess the outcome. Resources (including Web sites) for further learning are provided.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePsychiatryClinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, ContinuingEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansInternetMedical Informatics ApplicationsMental DisordersOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.